Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Aim and Scope
    • Research Area
    • Impact Factor
    • Indexing
  • For Authors
    • Authors Guidelines
    • How to publish paper?
    • Download Paper format
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Processing Charges
    • Download Copyrights Form
    • Submit Payment-Copyrights
  • Archives
    • Current Issues
    • Past Issues
    • Conference Issues
    • Special Issues
    • Advance Search
  • IJARIIE Board
    • Join as IJARIIE Board
    • Advisory Board
    • Editorial Board
    • Sr. Reviewer Board
    • Jr. Reviewer Board
  • Proposal
    • Conferece Proposal
    • Special Proposal
    • Faqs
  • Contact Us
  • Payment Detail

Call for Papers:Vol.11 Issue.3

Submission
Last date
28-Jun-2025
Acceptance Status In One Day
Paper Publish In Two Days
Submit ManuScript

News & Updates

Submit Article

Dear Authors, Article publish in our journal for Volume-11,Issue-3. For article submission on below link: Submit Manuscript


Join As Board

Dear Reviewer, You can join our Reviewer team without given any charges in our journal. Submit Details on below link: Join As Board


Paper Publication Charges

IJARIIE APP
Download Android App

For Authors

  • How to Publish Paper
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Processing Charges
  • Submit Payment

Archives

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issue

IJARIIE Board

  • Member Of Board
  • Join As Board

Downloads

  • Authors Guidelines
  • Manuscript Template
  • Copyrights Form

Android App

Download IJARIIE APP
  • Authors
  • Abstract
  • Citations
  • Downloads
  • Similar-Paper

Authors

Title: :  Assessment of MBBS medical students using (OSCE), comparing the modified borderline group method (MBGM), the modified Angoff method (MAM) and the holistic method of 50%
PaperId: :  1561
Published in:   International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education
Publisher:   IJARIIE
e-ISSN:   2395-4396
Volume/Issue:    Volume 2 Issue 1 2016
DUI:    16.0415/IJARIIE-1561
Licence: :   IJARIIE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author NameAuthor Institute
Mohamed Ahmed A/Gadir Elimam OunsaFaculty of Medicine, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan
Elsadig Yousif MohamedCollege of Medicine, Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia
Elmuntasir TahaFaculty of Medicine, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan

Abstract

medical eduaction
OSCE, standard setting, Modified Borderline Group Method, Modified Angoff Method, the Holistic Method
For many decades, the traditional long obstetric case (LOC) has been the method of medical students’ assessment in the clinical examination in most medical schools worldwide. Unfortunately, the conventional clinical and practical examinations are beset with several problems and have been shown to have serious limitations in terms of validity and reliability [1, 2], though, has the advantage of assessing the patient in a holistic approach [3]. In the past few decades the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) became very popular and many medical schools started to adopt it as an alternative to the long obstetric case. It is believed to answer the limitation of the long obstetric case [2, 4, 5, and 6]. In the (OSCE), which was first introduced by Hardeen in 1975 [6], the students move round a number of stations, which are structured to test different clinical skills appropriate to them. These skills are patients’ examination, history taking and communication besides technical and procedural skills as long as interpretation of laboratory investigations in the light of a patient's problem. At these stations the candidate may meet a patient, real or simulated, a manikin, or less commonly patient data. A set amount of time, usually five or six minutes, is spent at each station; occasionally more complex double time stations may be included. Usually, the same basic circuit is followed by all candidates, although data stations may be changed in order to maintain confidentiality. Old, children and severely ill patients may also be change to prevent fatigue [6,5,1,7,8].An advantage of the (OSCE) over assessments that use real patients is that the patients are standardized across examinees and thus the patient problems are essentially equivalent and examinee responses and scores are comparable [9]. The (OSCE) is a valuable assessment tool to provide outcome measures on the competency performance and evaluate program effectiveness [10]. In order for the (OSCE) to be a suitable alternative to the traditional examination, the criteria of validity, reliability, objectivity and practicability or feasibility are to be ensured [7]. However despite its advantages, the (OSCE) has disadvantages of being exhausting, labor, time and resource intensive, stressful and a strong anxiety-producing exam [11, 12, 13, and 14].The objective of this study was to assess the performance of the MBBS medical students in the (OSCE)final obstetrics and gynecology clinical examination in the National Ribat University, comparing three different standard setting methods: the modified borderline group method (MBGM), the modified Angoff method (MAM) and the holistic method of (50%).

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the links to import into a bibliography manager and reference.

IJARIIE Mohamed Ahmed A/Gadir Elimam Ounsa, Elsadig Yousif Mohamed, and Elmuntasir Taha. "Assessment of MBBS medical students using (OSCE), comparing the modified borderline group method (MBGM), the modified Angoff method (MAM) and the holistic method of 50%" International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education Volume 2 Issue 1 2016 Page 396-400
MLA Mohamed Ahmed A/Gadir Elimam Ounsa, Elsadig Yousif Mohamed, and Elmuntasir Taha. "Assessment of MBBS medical students using (OSCE), comparing the modified borderline group method (MBGM), the modified Angoff method (MAM) and the holistic method of 50%." International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education 2.1(2016) : 396-400.
APA Mohamed Ahmed A/Gadir Elimam Ounsa, Elsadig Yousif Mohamed, & Elmuntasir Taha. (2016). Assessment of MBBS medical students using (OSCE), comparing the modified borderline group method (MBGM), the modified Angoff method (MAM) and the holistic method of 50%. International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education, 2(1), 396-400.
Chicago Mohamed Ahmed A/Gadir Elimam Ounsa, Elsadig Yousif Mohamed, and Elmuntasir Taha. "Assessment of MBBS medical students using (OSCE), comparing the modified borderline group method (MBGM), the modified Angoff method (MAM) and the holistic method of 50%." International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education 2, no. 1 (2016) : 396-400.
Oxford Mohamed Ahmed A/Gadir Elimam Ounsa, Elsadig Yousif Mohamed, and Elmuntasir Taha. 'Assessment of MBBS medical students using (OSCE), comparing the modified borderline group method (MBGM), the modified Angoff method (MAM) and the holistic method of 50%', International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016, p. 396-400. Available from IJARIIE, https://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/Assessment_of_MBBS_medical_students_using__OSCE___comparing_the_modified_borderline_group_method__MBGM___the_modified_Angoff_method__MAM__and_the_holistic_method_of_50__ijariie1561.pdf (Accessed : 03 November 2023).
Harvard Mohamed Ahmed A/Gadir Elimam Ounsa, Elsadig Yousif Mohamed, and Elmuntasir Taha. (2016) 'Assessment of MBBS medical students using (OSCE), comparing the modified borderline group method (MBGM), the modified Angoff method (MAM) and the holistic method of 50%', International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education, 2(1), pp. 396-400IJARIIE [Online]. Available at: https://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/Assessment_of_MBBS_medical_students_using__OSCE___comparing_the_modified_borderline_group_method__MBGM___the_modified_Angoff_method__MAM__and_the_holistic_method_of_50__ijariie1561.pdf (Accessed : 03 November 2023)
IEEE Mohamed Ahmed A/Gadir Elimam Ounsa, Elsadig Yousif Mohamed, and Elmuntasir Taha, "Assessment of MBBS medical students using (OSCE), comparing the modified borderline group method (MBGM), the modified Angoff method (MAM) and the holistic method of 50%," International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 396-400, Jan-Feb 2016. [Online]. Available: https://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/Assessment_of_MBBS_medical_students_using__OSCE___comparing_the_modified_borderline_group_method__MBGM___the_modified_Angoff_method__MAM__and_the_holistic_method_of_50__ijariie1561.pdf [Accessed : 03 November 2023].
Turabian Mohamed Ahmed A/Gadir Elimam Ounsa, Elsadig Yousif Mohamed, and Elmuntasir Taha. "Assessment of MBBS medical students using (OSCE), comparing the modified borderline group method (MBGM), the modified Angoff method (MAM) and the holistic method of 50%." International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education [Online]. volume 2 number 1 (03 November 2023).
Vancouver Mohamed Ahmed A/Gadir Elimam Ounsa, Elsadig Yousif Mohamed, and Elmuntasir Taha. Assessment of MBBS medical students using (OSCE), comparing the modified borderline group method (MBGM), the modified Angoff method (MAM) and the holistic method of 50%. International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education [Internet]. 2016 [Cited : 03 November 2023]; 2(1) : 396-400. Available from: https://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/Assessment_of_MBBS_medical_students_using__OSCE___comparing_the_modified_borderline_group_method__MBGM___the_modified_Angoff_method__MAM__and_the_holistic_method_of_50__ijariie1561.pdf
BibTex EndNote RefMan RefWorks

Number Of Downloads


Last download on 11/3/2023 10:22:56 PM

Save in Google Drive

Similar-Paper

TitleArea of ResearchAuther NameAction
Development, Optimization, and In-Vitro Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Famciclovir 500 mg Oral Mucosal Tablets for Enhanced Bioavailability and Improved Patient CompliancePharmacyMr.Gaurav Shirsath Download
BENZOTHIAZOLES: A REVIEW OF THEIR PHARMACOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND THERAPEUTIC POTENTIALB.pharmacyR.Padma Download
BRIEF REVIEW ON THE QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN PHARMACEUTICALSPharmacyMr.Pavan Rashinkar Download
REVIEW ARTICLE OF FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF HERBAL FACE CREAMMedical EducationDanish Sharma Download
What is insulin resistance and how to fight it?MedicialKola Raj Kumar Download
FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF FACE SERUMB.PharmacyArti Dilip Palave Download
Development of FetusGynaecologist Hariom Rajput Download
Preparation in adult patients for pre-operative condition: psychologically and emotionally.medicalDr. Karan J. Yagnik, MD Download
A Literature Review on Theory-Practice Philosophy between Emerging Learning Theories and Pedagogical Strategies in Medical and Allied Health EducationMedical and Allied Health Education Ferissa B. Ablola, RMicro, MSPH (Medical Microbiology) Download
Formulation and Evaluation of Nanosuspension of Antiviral Ophthalmic ApplicationM. PharmacySejal Sonwane Download
Review of the data in Indian sandalwood santalum album L.PharmacyVaishali bhimrao Khedkar Download
Pharmaceutical drug delivery systems using polymersPharmacyPriti Ravindra Padse Download
A STUDY ON THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF SPORTS INJURIES, THEIR SYMTOPMS AND TREATMENTMedical SciencesRakam Singh Malik Download
PHARMACEUTICAL STUDY OF KHAGESHWARA RASAMedical scienceEBIN T U Download
Metabolic Disorder: Obesity in Jaunpur District, U.P.Nutrition scienceShipra Singh Download
12
For Authors
  • Submit Paper
  • Processing Charges
  • Submit Payment
Archive
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issue
IJARIIE Board
  • Member Of Board
  • Join As Board
Privacy and Policy
Follow us

Contact Info
  • +91-8401209201 (India)
  • +86-15636082010 (China)
  • ijariiejournal@gmail.com
  • M-20/234 Ami Appt,
    Nr.Naranpura Tele-Exch,
    Naranpura,
    Ahemdabad-380063
    Gujarat,India.
Copyright © 2025. IJARIIE. All Rights Reserved.